Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  15 148 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 15 148 Next Page
Page Background

3.3.

Functional outcomes: classic complications

The complications of PCa treatment that are best charac-

terized and most frequently discussed are urinary inconti-

nence and erectile dysfunction. The SPCG-4 trial

demonstrated that radical prostatectomy increased rates

of these complications but decreased rates of urinary

obstruction in comparison to watchful waiting

[39]

. Owing

to the field effects of radiotherapy, both EBRT and

brachytherapy significantly affect HRQoL bowel and rectal

domains

[40]

. While most bowel effects are transient, a

proportion persist for many years after treatment

[40]

. Typ-

ically, bowel symptoms are worse for patients undergoing

EBRT than those receiving brachytherapy

[41] .

As with global HRQoL, three randomized controlled trials

compared functional PROs for those treated with surgery and

radiotherapy. In the ProtecT study, surgery was associated

with higher rates of urinary incontinence and erectile

dysfunction, while radiotherapy had greater obstructive

urinary symptoms and bowel symptoms

[36]

. Differences

in urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction between

treatment modalities diminished with longer follow-up

[36]

,

in keeping with the observational findings of the Prostate

Cancer Outcomes Study

[42] .

Lennernas et al

[21]

found no

significant differences in urinary urgency, urinary inconti-

nence, erectile dysfunction, sexual interest, or rectal bleeding

between men treated with surgery and radiotherapy. They

noted significant worsening of urinary incontinence, erectile

dysfunction, and sexual interest over time in both groups.

Gilberti et al

[37]

found that men treated with brachytherapy

had worse urinary function at 6 and 12 mo, worse bowel

function at 6 mo, and better erectile function at 6 mo

compared to those treated surgically. However, therewere no

significant differences in any functional outcome at 5 yr.

There is a wealth of observational data examining

functional PROs. Most notably, the Prostate Cancer Out-

comes Study recruited 3533 men from six Surveillance,

Epidemiology and End Results registries

[42]

, of whom

1655 patients with localized disease received surgery or

radiotherapy treatment within 1 yr of diagnosis and

completed follow-up surveys beyond 2 yr. At 2 and 5 yr

following treatment, men receiving surgery were more

likely to report urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunc-

tion, while those receiving radiotherapy were more likely to

report bowel urgency and bother due to bowel symptoms

[42]

. By 15 yr, all differences became nonsignificant, except

for bowel symptoms, which remained higher among men

treated with radiotherapy

[42]

. In addition, by 15 yr, most

men had developed erectile dysfunction

[42]

. More recent

observational data have corroborated these findings among

men treated with modern treatments, albeit with short

follow-up (2 yr and 3 yr)

[43,44]

.

Despite these data, a recent systematic review concluded

there were insufficient data on symptomatic and QoL

outcomes following localized PCa treatment to provide

meaningful treatment guidance

[45]

. In part, this is because

of the use of differing assessment measures. A recent Delphi

consensus among patients, urologists, and radiation oncol-

ogists sought to standardize the reporting of outcomes

following localized PCa treatment

[46]

. They advocated use

of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26)

for assessment of PROs, although numerous others were

also endorsed. Data collection for 10 yr following treatment

was recommended.

3.4.

Functional outcomes: novel complications

Complications related to PCa treatment may necessitate

interventions including urologic procedures, rectal-anal

procedures, and major surgery. These complications, includ-

ing genitourinary or gastrointestinal bleeding, infection, and

urinary obstruction, may also require planned or unplanned

hospitalization

[47] .

In addition, a further risk following

radiotherapy is treatment-induced secondary malignancy.

In a large population-based cohort of patients treated for

nonmetastatic PCa in Ontario, Canada, radiotherapy treat-

ment was associated with higher risks of hospitalization,

rectal-anal procedures, major surgeries, and secondary

cancers, but lower risk of minimally invasive urologic

procedures, when compared to surgery

[47] .

After propen-

sity score matching to account for baseline differences,

patients receiving radiotherapy had greater long-term risk

of all of these outcomes

[48] .

Validation in an independent

cohort of patients from the USA showed that these

complications frequently recur (mean 2.6 per patient)

and continue for years following treatment

[49,50]

. Using

the same patient cohort but different analysis methods,

Williams et al

[51]

found no difference in treatment-

related hospitalizations, although there was greater cost

associated with treatment of patients who received

radiotherapy.

While the use of postoperative radiotherapy contributed

to higher complication rates, when taken on an intention-

to-treat basis, the initial decision to begin therapy with

surgery was associated with lower long-term risk of all

procedural interventions and hospitalizations

[9]

.

Complications arising from radiotherapy, the end

result of which is chronic tissue ischemia

[52] ,

have

a profoundly different prognosis than those arising

following surgery, which maintains the underlying tissue

integrity. Radiotherapy-associated complications are signif-

icantly more burdensome and often entail a much slower

recovery, with impaired long-term function

[53] .

Most

notably, urinary fistulae following prostate radiotherapy

often require urinary diversion and are associated with

significant morbidity

[54] .

In the Ontario cohort, patients treated with radiotherapy

had a significantly higher risk of secondary cancers

(standardized incidence rate [SIR] 2.0, 95% CI 1.7–2.3), driven

by anexcess of secondary cancers inmen aged40–65yr at the

time of radiotherapy (SIR 3.5, 95% CI 2.3–4.7)

[47] .

This

finding has recently been supported by a meta-analysis

comprising 21 studies and up to 555 873 patients

[55]

that

revealed a greater risk of in-field secondary malignancies

(bladder, rectal, and colorectal cancers) but not of out-of-field

malignancies among patients treated with radiotherapy,

although the absolute risk was small (0–1.4 cases per

100 patients treated)

[55] .

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 3 ( 2 0 1 8 ) 1 1 – 2 0

15