Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  73 148 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 73 148 Next Page
Page Background

eight patients (5%), stage could not be assigned. Tissue for

CGP was obtained from the kidney in 102 patients (60%)

and from metastatic sites in 67 patients (40%). Frequent

sites of metastasis included distant lymph nodes, soft

tissue, lung, and liver.

3.2.

Genomic characterization of advanced PRCC cases

An average of 2.4 mutations per tumor were detected. The

median tumor mutational burden (TMB) for all cases was

2.7 mutations/Mb and there was minimal variation in TMB

across subtypes, with 2.7 mutations/Mb representing the

median across type 1, type 2, and unclassified disease

( Table 1 )

. In the overall cohort, the most frequent

alterations were in the

TERT

promoter (21%),

CDKN2A

(17%),

MET

(13%),

CDKN2B

(11%), and

FH

(11%)

( Fig. 1 A

). One

pathogenic

FH

missense mutation was reported (R233H)

[17]

; the remaining

FH

mutations were loss-of-function

truncation mutations. The median age was significantly

lower for patients with

FH

mutations compared to all PRCC

patients (37 vs 60 yr;

p

= 3 10

6

,

t

test, 2-tailed). In type

1 patients, the most commonly altered genes were

MET

(33%; 8 activating mutations, 5 amplifications at

>

6 copies),

TERT

(30%),

CDKN2A/B

(13%), and

EGFR

(8%;

1 activating mutation G598 V, 2 amplifications)

( Fig. 1

B).

Out of the 13 type 1 PRCC cases with

MET

alterations, three

had a concurrent GA in

EGFR

(1 case with G598 V mutation,

1 with amplification) or

KRAS

(1 case with G12C). In type

2 patients, the most commonly altered genes were

CDKN2A/

B

(18%),

TERT

(18%),

NF2

(13%), and

FH

(13%);

MET

GAs

(5 mutations, 3 amplifications) were observed in 7% of type

2 patients

( Fig. 1 C

).

Fig. 1 D

shows a pathway analysis

segregated by PRCC subtype. Alterations in SWI/SNF

complex genes were significantly associated with type

2 PRCC. Overall, frequent alterations were found in genes

coding for components of SWI/SNF complexes (26%),

chromatin modification (24%), and cell cycle regulation

(22%). RAS/RAF pathway (7%), PI3K/mTOR pathway (8%),

and DNA damage pathway (8%) alterations were observed,

although alterations in individual genes comprising these

pathways were less frequent.

Within the

MET

protooncogene, the preponderance of

alterations was found in the tyrosine kinase domain

( Fig. 2 )

.

The most frequent

MET

alteration was H1094Y/L, seen in

three patients with type 1 disease and two patients with

type 2 disease.

MET

alterations found in more than one

patient include V1092I and F1200I.

Fig. 3

highlights several of the key differences in GAs

between type 1 and type 2 PRCC in this cohort. A

significantly higher frequency of

MET

alteration was found

in type 1 versus type 2 disease (33% vs 7%;

p

= 0.0002).

Furthermore,

NF2

alterations were more frequent in type

2 versus type 1 disease (13% vs none;

p

= 0.02). Although not

statistically significant, a trend towards higher

TERT

promoter alterations in type 1 disease was observed (30%

vs 18%). By contrast, type 2 disease showed a trend towards

higher alterations in

SMARCB1

(9% vs 3%),

ARID1A

(10% vs

3%),

BAP1

(7% vs none),

SETD2

(9% vs 3%), and

PBRM1

(7% vs

none).

As noted in

Table 1

, primary tumor (kidney) samples

were assessed more frequently than metastatic samples. A

slightly higher proportion of patients with type 2 disease

had metastatic samples for assessment (45%) compared to

patients with type 1 (33%) or unclassified disease (23%).

With this in mind, primary tumor specimens had a

significantly higher rate of alteration in

MET

(18% vs 6%;

p

= 0.03), while metastatic sites had a higher rate of

ARID1A

alterations (13% vs 4%;

p

= 0.04). Supplementary

Table 1

highlights similar trends in

MET

and

ARID1A

alteration

frequencies between kidney and metastasis when segre-

gated by subtype (type 1 vs type 2).

A more detailed analysis of SWI/SNF pathway elements

is shown in

Fig. 4 .

Overall, 26% of patients had alterations in

related genes, with the most frequent alterations noted in

SMARCB1

(8%),

ARID1A

(8%), and

PBRM1

(6%). The cumula-

tive frequency of SWI/SNF alterations was higher in type

2 than in type 1 disease (29% vs 11%;

p

= 0.027).

Pairwise analysis for co-occurrence/mutual exclusivity

was performed for the 12 most frequently mutated genes in

this study.

PBRM1/SETD2

mutation co-occurrence was

significant (

p

= 0.0001). At lower levels of significance,

BAP1/NF2

(

p

= 0.02) and

SETD2/BAP1

(

p

= 0.04) mutations

Table 1 – Patient characteristics

All

Type 1

Type 2

Unclassified

Patients (

n

)

169

39

108

22

Median age, yr (range)

60 (19–88)

60 (30–88)

59 (19–85)

61 (25–76)

Female,

n

(%)

40 (24)

10

26

4

Male,

n

(%)

129 (76)

29

82

18

Median TMB, mutations/Mb (range)

2.7 (0–13.5)

2.7 (0.9–9.0)

2.7 (0–13.5)

2.7 (0–8.1)

Sit of origin for sequenced sample (

n

)

Kidney

102

26

59

17

Metastasis

67

13

49

5

Clinical stage (

n

)

Stage I

14

5

7

2

Stage II

8

3

4

1

Stage III

36

9

22

5

Stage IV

103

20

70

13

Unknown

8

2

5

1

TMB = tumor mutational burden.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 3 ( 2 0 1 8 ) 7 1 – 7 8

73