Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  86 148 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 86 148 Next Page
Page Background

Table 2 – Study characteristics

First author

Origin of study

Study design

Reference standard

Blinding

Reader characteristics

Publication

year

Duration

of patient

recruitment

Institution

Prospective Multicenter Consecutive

enrollment

Methods

Details of BVC

MRI–reference

standard

interval

No.

Consensus

Experience

(yr)

Conde-Moreno

[

[6_TD$DIFF] 15]

2016

10.2014–3.2015 Consorcio

Hospitalario

Provincial de

Castello´n

Yes

No

Yes

BVC

All imaging studies (BS, CT, WB-

DW-MRI, choline-PET/CT) by a

multidisciplinary team

NR

Yes

NR NR

NR

Kitajima

[

[7_TD$DIFF] 16]

2014

6.2009–4.2012 Mayo Clinic

No

No

Yes

BVC or

histopathology

Dedicated CT, MRI, or PET–CT

and follow-up after 6 mo

NR

Yes

2 Independent 22/2

Lecouvet

[4]

2007

NR

a [12_TD$DIFF]

Cliniques

universitaires

Saint Luc

Yes

No

Yes

BVC or

histopathology

CT correlation for equivocal MRI

findings or imaging (BS, MRI),

clinical, and biological follow-

up at 6 mo by specialists for

each modality

NR

Yes

2 Consensus

Senior MSK

radiologist/

senior resident

Lecouvet

[5]

2012

3.2007–3.2010 Cliniques

universitaires

Saint Luc

Yes

No

Yes

BVC

All available imaging tests (BS/

TXR, WB-MRI) and clinical/

biological follow-up after 6 mo

by specialists for each modality

NR

Yes

2 Independent Senior MSK

radiologist/

fellow

Mosavi

[ [8_TD$DIFF] 17]

2012

10.2009–3.2011 Uppsala

University

Hospital

Yes

No

Yes

BVC

BS, MRI (T1WI, STIR), and

follow-up using 18F-NaF PET/CT

and DWI

7 mo

Yes

2 Consensus

20

Pasoglou

[

[9_TD$DIFF] 18]

2015

2.2012–12.2012 Cliniques

universitaires

Saint Luc,

Centre

Hospitalier

Universitaire

Vaudois

Yes

Yes

Yes

BVC

Consensus session of all

available MRI by radiologists,

prospective clinical and

biological follow-up by uro-

oncologist, and imaging follow-

up at 6 mo

NR

Yes

NR NR

NR

Piccardo

[9]

2014

NR

E.O. Galliera

Hospital, Azienda

Sanitaria dell’Alto

Adige

Yes

Yes

NR

BVC

Contrast-enhanced CT and

multiparametric MRI at 12 mo

follow-up, and response to

treatment, lab tests, other

imaging studies (x-ray, BS)

12–18 mo

NR

NR NR

NR

Vargas

[

[10_TD$DIFF] 19]

2016

1.2000–6.2014 Memorial Sloan

Kettering

Cancer Center

No

No

No

BVC or

histopathology

At least 1 yr or imaging/clinical

follow-up

>

1 yr

Yes

2 Independent 5/7

Venkitaraman

[

[11_TD$DIFF] 20]

2009

1.2001–10.2005 Royal Marsden

Hospital

No

No

Yes

BVC

MRI, BS, or other imaging (TXR,

CT) and follow-up studies (BS or

MRI) assessing treatment

response

NR

Yes

1

NR

Woo

[6]

2016

1.2013–12.2013 Seoul National

University Hospital

No

No

Yes

BVC or

histopathology

Comprehensive review of initial

and follow-up BS, MRI, CT, TXR,

and PET, and clinical/laboratory

follow-up at a multidisciplinary

urological–oncological

conference

NR

Yes

2 Independent 20/34

BS = bone scintigraphy; BVC = best value comparator; CT = computed tomography; DW = diffusion weighted; DWI = diffusion-weighted imaging; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; MSK = musculoskeletal; NR = not

reported; PET = positron emission tomography; STIR = short tau inversion recovery; TXR = targeted x-ray; T1WI = T1-weighted imaging; WB = whole body.

a

Duration of patient recruitment not reported, but overlap with Lecouvet et al

[5] (3

.2007–3.2010) not possible.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 3 ( 2 0 1 8 ) 8 1 – 9 1

86