Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  104 148 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 104 148 Next Page
Page Background

Five-year recurrence rates for transplantation and

dialysed patients were 4.2

29% versus 24

57%, respectively.

Five-year cancer-specific survival rates and overall survival

were 86

98% and 43

88%, respectively, for patients who

remained on dialysis. Cancer-specific and overall survival

rates were not reported for transplanted patients.

3.3.4.

Testicular cancer

Three studies evaluated patients suffering from TC

( Table 8

)

[4,8]

. The 5-yr recurrence rate was 5%. The waiting period

before transplantation was not defined. Histology and

grade were specified only in two case reports: stage I

seminoma and teratoma. Cancer-specific and overall

survivals of 100% at 1

5 yr were reported in the two case

reports.

3.4.

RoB and confounding

The RoB and confounding was relevant, in particular in the

light of the generally low level of evidence studies

( Fig. 2

).

The type of urological malignancy and the risk of recurrence

were taken into account in most of the studies. The duration

of the tumour-free period to transplantation and the

confirmation of a tumour-free status prior to transplanta-

tion were relevant only for the studies with an intervention

arm (transplantation).2

4.

Conclusions

4.1.

Principal findings

For RCC, the risk of recurrence was similar between

transplantation and dialysis. Stage, grade, histological

subtype, and solid/cystic component of the tumour were

the main prognostic factors for recurrence.

For PC, data were too scarce to reach a conclusion on the

impact of transplantation on the risk of recurrence because

the majority of the included studies were noncomparative

and involved only transplanted patients. Except in the study

of Woodle et al

[9]

, which is the last update of the Cincinnati

Registry, studies included mainly PC with favourable

prognosis: low stage, low grade, and low recurrence rates

consistent with nomograms (D

Amico, Partin, Kattan,

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)

[9]

.

For urothelial carcinoma, the studies mainly included

UUTUC in the context of aristolochic acid nephropathy. In

this specific situation, the rate of synchronous bilateral

tumour was 10

16% and the rate of contralateral recurrence

was 31

39%. Data on bladder urothelial carcinoma and TC

were scarce.

For TC, one case report highlighted the possibility of late

recurrence (2.3 yr) even for a stage I seminoma.

4.2.

Findings in the context of existing evidence

Organ transplantation is a risk factor of cancer recurrence

especially for viral-induced cancers. However, this risk is

modulated by the type of cancer and the type of transplant

[10] .

Table 8

Oncological outcomes of included patients with a history of testicular cancer: renal transplantation (I) versus renal replacement therapy (C)

Study

(1st author, yr)

Primary

management

Arms

(no. of

patients)

Cancer

recurrence

Cancer speci

fi

c

survival (time)

Overall

survival

(time)

Histological

outcomes

Follow-up

a

(yr)

Free period to

transplantation

(yr)

Recommendations concerning

waiting period & prognostic

factors of recurrence, according to

authors of the included studies

5 yr

>

5 yr

Penn, 1997

[4]

NS

I (43)

NS

5%

NS

NS

NS

>

5

NS

Low risk of recurrence

Consider transplantation according

to clinical, radiological, and

biochemical criteria

Dean, 2005

[8]

1 Orchidectomy +

adjuvant

radiotherapy 20 Gy

I (1)

100% NS

100% (1

5 yr)

100% (1

5 yr)

Seminoma

stage I

4.3

2

Case-by-case discussion for waiting

period before transplantation

Transplantation did not interfere

with chemotherapy for recurrence at

2.3 yr

Juric, 2017

[47]

1 Orchidectomy

I (1)

0%

100%

100% (

>

5 yr)

100% (

>

5 yr)

Teratoma

3.6

20

Retroperitoneal recurrence 8 4 cm

(seminoma) treated by

lymphadenectomy + adjuvant

chemotherapy (cisplatine/etoposide).

Free from recurrence with 2 yr of

follow up.

C = control (dialysis); I = intervention; NR = not relevant; NS = not speci

fi

ed.

a

From cancer treatment to last news.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O GY 7 3 ( 2 0 18 ) 9 4

10 8

104