Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  137 148 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 137 148 Next Page
Page Background

stratification and clinical decision making for selected

patients with newly diagnosed disease.

Author contributions:

Stephen K. Van Den Eeden had full access to all the

data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and

the accuracy of the data analysis.

Study concept and design:

Van Den Eeden, Quesenberry, Zhang, Lawrence,

Febbo, Presti.

Acquisition of data:

Han, Tsiatis, Shan, Leimpeter, Zhang, Presti.

Analysis and interpretation of data:

Van Den Eeden, Lu, Zhang, Shan,

Lawrence, Febbo, Presti.

Drafting of the manuscript:

Van Den Eeden, Lawrence, Lu, Febbo, Presti.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content:

Van

Den Eeden, Lu, Lawrence, Febbo, Quesenberry, Presti.

ce:italic>Statistical analysis: Lu, Zhang

[1_TD$DIFF]

, Quesenberry, Shan.

Obtaining funding:

None.

Administrative, technical, or material support:

Van Den Eeden, Lawrence.

Supervision:

Van Den Eeden, Lawrence.

Other:

None.

Financial disclosures:

Stephen K. Van Den Eeden certi

fi

es that all

con

fl

icts of interest, including speci

fi

c

fi

nancial interests and relation-

ships and af

fi

liations relevant to the subject matter or materials

discussed in the manuscript (eg, employment/af

fi

liation, grants or

funding, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert

testimony, royalties, or patents

fi

led, received, or pending), are the

following: Stephen K. Van Den Eeden received funding from Genomic

Health Inc. to conduct this study. He has received research support from

Abbott Molecular and the National Institutes of Health. Ruixiao Lu is a

full-time employee of and has stock in Genomic Health, Inc. Nan Zhang

was a full-time employee of and has stock in Genomic Health, Inc.

Charles P. Quesenberry Jr, received salary support for this study from the

research grant from Genomic Health Inc. He has received research

support from the National Institutes of Health. Jun Shan received salary

support for this study from the research grant from Genomic Health Inc.

Jeong S. Han received salary support for this study from the research

grant from Genomic Health Inc. Athanasios C. Tsiatis is a full-time

employee of and has stock in Genomic Health, Inc. Amethyst D.

Leimpeter received salary support for this study from the research grant

fromGenomic Health Inc. H. Jeffrey Lawrence is a paid consultant for and

has stock in Genomic Health, Inc. Phillip G. Febbo is a full-time employee

of and has stock in Genomic Health, Inc. Joseph C. Presti received salary

support for this study from the research grant from Genomic Health Inc.

Funding/Support and role of the sponsor:

This study was sponsored by

Genomic Health, Inc., which was involved in the design and conduct of

the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the

data; and preparation, review, and approval of the manuscript. Genomic

Health, Inc. performed the genomic testing and analyses described and

provided

fi

nancial support to KPNC.

Acknowledgements:

The authors acknowledge Agnes Nemeth, Kevin

Chew, Hargita Kaplan, Cindy Loman, Greg Jones, Rahul Peethala, Kenny

Wong, Dejan Knezevic, Aditi Dedhia, Rory O

Brien, and Keith Gran from

Genomic Health, Inc. and Daniel Fernandez, Deborah Burman, Judith

Morse, Erica Kereszi, and Marilyn Foley at KPNC for their logistical and

technical support, and Emily Burke for providing assistance in the

preparation of the manuscript.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

Supplementary data associated with this article can be

found, in the online version, at

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. eururo.2017.09.013

.

References

[1]

Sartori DA, Chan DW. Biomarkers in prostate cancer: what s new? Curr Opin Oncol 2014;26:259 64.

[2]

Davis JW. Novel commercially available genomic tests for prostate cancer: a roadmap to understanding their clinical impact. BJU Int 2014;114:320 2

.

[3]

National Comprehensive Cancer Network practice guidelines in oncology. Prostate Cancer v2 2017

.

[4]

Simon RM, Paik S, Hayes DF. Use of archived specimens in evalua- tion of prognostic and predictive biomarkers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009;101:1446 52.

[5]

Febbo PG, Ladanyi M, Aldape KD, et al. NCCN Task Force report: evaluating the clinical utility of tumor markers in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2011;9(Suppl 5):S1 32

.

[6]

Knezevic D, Goddard AD, Natraj N, et al. Analytical validation of the oncotype DX prostate cancer assay a clinical RT-PCR assay opti- mized for prostate needle biopsies. BMC Genomics 2013;14:690.

[7]

Klein EA, Cooperberg MR, Magi-Galluzzi C, et al. A 17-gene assay to predict prostate cancer aggressiveness in the context of Gleason grade heterogeneity, tumor multifocality, and biopsy undersam- pling. Eur Urol 2014;66:550 60

.

[8]

Cullen J, Rosner IL, Brand TC, et al. A biopsy-based 17-gene Genomic Prostate Score predicts recurrence after radical prostatectomy and adverse surgical pathology in a racially diverse population of men with clinically low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2015;68:123 31

.

[9]

Albala D, Kemeter MJ, Febbo PG, et al. Health economic impact and prospective clinical utility of Oncotype DX Genomic Prostate Score. Rev Urol 2016;18:123 32.

[10]

Badani KK, Kemeter MJ, Febbo PG, et al. The impact of a biopsy based 17-gene Genomic Prostate Score on treatment recommendations in men with newly diagnosed clinically localized prostate cancer who are candidates for active surveillance. Urol Pract 2015;2:181 9

.

[11]

Hu CY, Xing Y, Cormier JN, Chang GJ. Assessing the utility of cancer- registry-processed cause of death in calculating cancer-speci fi c survival. Cancer 2013;119:1900 7.

[12]

Gray RJ. Weighted analyses for cohort sampling designs. Lifetime Data Anal 2009;15:24 40

.

[13]

McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, et al. Reporting recommen- dations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK). J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:1180 4

.

[14]

Epstein JI, Allsbrook Jr WC, Amin MB, Egevad LL. ISUP Grading Committee. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carci- noma. Am J Surg Pathol 2005;29:1228–42

.

[15]

Therneau TM, Grambsch PM. Modeling survival data: extending the Cox model. New York, NY: Springer; 2000.

[16]

Hochberg Y, Tamhane AC. Multiple comparison procedures. New York, NY: Wiley; 1987.

[17]

Therneau TM, Grambsch PM, Fleming TR. Martingale-based resi- duals for survival models. Biometrika 1990;77:47 160.

[18]

Schoenfeld D. Residuals for the proportional hazards regression model. Biometrika 1982;69:239 41.

[19]

Can fi eld SE, Kibel AS, Kemeter MJ, Febbo PG, Lawrence HJ, Moul JW. A guide for clinicians in the evaluation of emerging molecular diagnostics for newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Rev Urol 2014;16:172 80

.

[20]

Cuzick J, Swanson GP, Fisher G, et al. Prognostic value of an RNA expression signature derived from cell cycle proliferation genes in patients with prostate cancer: a retrospective study. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:245 55.

[21]

Bishoff JT, Freedland SJ, Gerber L, et al. Prognostic utility of the cell cycle progression score generated from biopsy in men treated with prostatectomy. J Urol 2014;192:409 14

.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O GY 7 3 ( 2 0 18 ) 12 9

13 8

137