Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  51 148 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 51 148 Next Page
Page Background

Platinum Priority – Editorial

Referring to the article published on pp. 40–50 of this issue

Bladder Cancer in the Elderly

Marko Babjuk

*

Department of Urology, Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

Bladder cancer is one of the most common tumours and a

significant cause of tumour-related death worldwide. In

this issue of

European Urology

, Fonteyne and coauthors

[1]

present an analysis of curative treatments for muscle-

invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) in elderly patients. Through

their systematic review of the literature, the authors clearly

demonstrate decreases in cancer-specific and overall

survival and an increase in perioperative mortality after

radical cystectomy with age. In other words, patients aged

>

70 yr or

>

80 yr are at greater risk of postoperative

complications and of death from bladder cancer.

To provide adequate and effective management for

elderly patients with MIBC, we need to concentrate on some

important points and questions.

1.

How significant is the problem for the health

care system?

The aging of the population is a phenomenon apparent in all

developed countries. The percentage of elderly people is

dramatically increasing. For example, in the EU in 2016,

13.5% (nearly 69million people) of the population was older

than 70 yr and 5.4% (more than 27 million people) was older

than 80 yr

( http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database )

.

The incidence of bladder cancer is increasing with age.

According to the cancer registry of the Czech Republic, 55%

of bladder cancer cases detected were in individuals aged

>

70 yr and 23% in those aged

>

80 yr. Moreover, the

proportion of more advanced stages is higher among older

than among younger patients. To demonstrate the real load

for a health care system, in the Czech Republic (population

10 million) 470 patients aged

>

70 yr and 220 aged

>

80 yr

had stage T2–4 bladder cancer newly detected in 2014

( www.uroweb.cz )

.

2.

How significant is the problem for our patients?

MIBC is a life-threatening disease. Median survival among

patients with unresectable or metastatic bladder urothelial

carcinoma treated with systemic chemotherapy was

reported as 14.8 mo, with 17% surviving for 5 yr

[2] .

By

contrast, the average life expectancy of EU citizens was

15.9 yr at age 70 yr and 9.2 yr at age 80 yr in 2015. These data

strongly support the use of curative treatments in elderly

patients with tumours that are still potentially curable. In

spite of this, the adoption of radical surgery is underused.

According to data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and

End Results database, only 21% of elderly patients (

>

65 yr)

with MIBC underwent radical cystectomy even though

overall survival was better among cystectomy cases

[3]

. Similarly, the US National Cancer Data Base demonstrat-

ed that the indication for radical cystectomy dramatically

decreased with age, and the same tendency can be observed

in Europe (see ref.

[4]

and ref. [49] from ref.

[1]

).

3.

What is the optimal performance of radical

cystectomy in elderly patients?

Radical cystectomy with urinary diversion is considered the

standard treatment for patients with nonmetastatic MIBC. It

must be underlined that in the elderly population, optimal

results can only be expected if the usual principles of

oncologic surgery, including thorough pelvic lymphadenec-

tomy, are maintained

[5] .

Radical cystectomy is a complex surgery with a high risk

of postoperative morbidity and mortality, as clearly

demonstrated by Fonteyne et al

[1]

. Significant numbers

of serious complications, particularly gastroinestinal, are

associated with urinary diversion. Careful selection of the

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 3 ( 2 0 1 8 ) 5 1 – 5 2

ava ilable at

www.sciencedirect.com

journal homepage:

www.eu ropeanurology.com

DOI of original article:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.03.019

.

* Department of Urology, FN Motol, V U´ valu 84, 15006 Prague 5, Czech Republic. Tel. +420 224434801.

E-mail address:

marek.babjuk@fnmotol.cz

.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.018

0302-2838/

#

2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.