Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  129 148 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 129 148 Next Page
Page Background

Prostate Cancer

A Biopsy-based 17-gene Genomic Prostate Score as a Predictor of

Metastases and Prostate Cancer Death in Surgically Treated Men

with Clinically Localized Disease

Stephen K. Van Den Eeden

a , * , Ruixiao Lu b , Nan Zhang b , Charles P. Quesenberry Jr . a , Jun Shan a ,

Jeong S. Han

c , Athanasios C. Tsiatis b , Amethyst D. Leimpeter a , H. Jeffrey Lawrence b ,

Phillip G. Febbo

b , Joseph C. Presti d

a

Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA;

b

Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA;

c

Division of Pathology,

Kaiser Oakland Medical Center, Oakland, CA, USA;

d

Division of Urology, Kaiser Oakland Medical Center, Oakland, CA, USA

E U R O P E A N U R O L O GY 7 3 ( 2 0 18 ) 1 2 9 13 8

ava ilable at

www.sciencedirect.com

journal homepage:

www.eu ropeanurology.com

Article info

Article history:

Accepted September 2, 2017

Associate Editor:

James Catto

Keywords:

Gene expression

Molecular diagnostic testing

Prostate cancer

Please visit

www.eu-acme.org/ europeanurology

to read and

answer questions on-line.

The EU-ACME credits will

then be attributed

automatically.

Abstract

Background:

A 17-gene biopsy-based reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

assay, which provides a Genomic Prostate Score (GPS

scale 0

100), has been validated as

an independent predictor of adverse pathology and biochemical recurrence after radical

prostatectomy (RP) in men with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa).

Objective:

To evaluate GPS as a predictor of PCa metastasis and PCa-speci

fi

c death (PCD)

in a large cohort of men with localized PCa and long-term follow-up.

Design, setting, and participants:

A retrospective study using a strati

fi

ed cohort sam-

pling design was performed in a cohort of men treated with RP within Kaiser Perma-

nente Northern California. RNA from archival diagnostic biopsies was assayed to

generate GPS results.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis:

We assessed the association between

GPS and time to metastasis and PCD in prespeci

fi

ed uni- and multivariable statistical

analyses, based on Cox proportional hazard models accounting for sampling weights.

Results and limitations:

The

fi

nal study population consisted of 279 men with low-,

intermediate-, and high-risk PCa between 1995 and 2010 (median follow-up 9.8 yr), and

included 64 PCD and 79 metastases. Valid GPS results were obtained for 259 (93%). In

univariable analysis, GPS was strongly associated with time to PCD, hazard ratio (HR)/20

GPS units = 3.23 (95% con

fi

dence interval [CI] 1.84

5.65;

p

<

0.001), and time to metas-

tasis, HR/20 units = 2.75 (95% CI 1.63

4.63;

p

<

0.001). The association between GPS and

both end points remained signi

fi

cant after adjusting for National Comprehensive Cancer

Network, American Urological Association, and Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment

(CAPRA) risks (

p

<

0.001). No patient with low- or intermediate-risk disease and a GPS

of

<

20 developed metastases or PCD (

n

= 31). In receiver operating characteristic

analysis of PCD at 10 yr, GPS improved the c-statistic from 0.78 (CAPRA alone) to

0.84 (GPS + CAPRA;

p

<

0.001). A limitation of the study was that patients were treated

during an era when de

fi

nitive treatment was standard of care with little adoption of

active surveillance.

Conclusions:

GPS is a strong independent predictor of long-term outcomes in clinically

localized PCa in men treated with RP and may improve risk strati

fi

cation for men with

newly diagnosed disease.

Patient summary:

Many prostate cancers are slow growing and unlikely to spread

or threaten a man

s life, while others are more aggressive and require treatment.

* Corresponding author. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, 2000 Broadway, Oakland,

CA 94612, USA. Tel. +1-510-891-3718; Fax: +1-510-891-3761.

E-mail address:

Stephen.Vandeneeden@kp.org

(S.K. Van Den Eeden).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.09.013

0302-2838/© 2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.