Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  98 148 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 98 148 Next Page
Page Background

Table 2

Characteristics of the included studies: prostate cancer

Study

(1st author, yr)

Study

type

Recruitment

period

Mean age

(yr)

Mean

follow-up

from cancer

treatment,

yr (range or SD)

No. of patients

Duration of

dialysis before

cancer treatment,

yr (mean, range,

or SD)

Transplantation Dialysis

Tillou, 2014

[25]

Retrospective

cohort study

2003

2013

62

3.2 (0.5

6.5)

14

5

NS

Chapman, 2001

[46]

Retrospective

cohort study

1963

1999

NS

NS

5

42

NS

Woodle, 200

5 a [ 9]

Retrospective

cohort study

NS

61

3.32 (1.7

15.2)

9

0 b

0

NS

Chahwan, 2017

[38]

Retrospective

cohort study

1993

2015

59.8 (45.6

72.9)

3

52

0

NS

Schonberger, 2002

[39]

Case report

NS

62

4

1

1

NS

Ozcelik, 2015

[40]

Case report

2015

63

1.5

1

0

NS

Kocak, 2009

[41]

Case report

2009

2010

57

0.5

1

0

NS

Yiou, 1999

[26]

Case report

1999

69

4.5

1

0

NS

NS = not stated; SD = standard deviation.

a

Woodle 2005 is the last update of the prostate cancer cancer cohort of Penn 1997.

b

77 renal, 10 heart, 3 liver transplantations.

Table 1

Characteristics of the included studies: kidney cancer

Study

(1st author, yr)

Study

type

Recruitment

period

Mean

age (yr)

Mean follow-up

from cancer

treatment,

yr (range or SD)

No. of patients

Duration of

dialysis before

cancer treatment,

yr (mean, range, or SD)

Transplantation Dialysis

Ryosaka, 2015

[27]

Retrospective

cohort study

2000

2013 56 11

3.75 3.5

44

158

14.2 8

Chapman, 2001

[46]

Retrospective

cohort study

1963

1999 NS

NS

37

73

NS

Savaj, 2003

[28]

Retrospective

cohort study

1997

2002 52

NS

2

6

5.1

Penn, 199

7 a [ 4]

Retrospective

cohort study

<

1997

NS

>

5

274

0

NS

Breda, 2015

[14]

Retrospective

cohort study

NS

58 (37

66)

7.52 (7.02

7.99)

58

0

4.0

Sheashaa, 2011

[23]

Retrospective

cohort study

1997

2008 56 14

4.7

12

0

1.8 (0.4

5)

Median

(min

max)

Denton, 2002

[24]

Retrospective

cohort study

1994

2000 53 6

2.6 1.9

11

0

3.36 (0

10)

Joshi, 2008

[29]

Case report

2008

37

9

1

0

0.5

Takagi, 2017

[30]

Retrospective

cohort study

1982

2015 56 11

4.8 4.7

0

467

14.3 9

Stiles, 2003

[35]

Retrospective

cohort study

1995

1990 61

2.12

0

404

NS

Shrewsberry, 2014

[31]

Retrospective

cohort study

1999

2001 56 13

NS

0

95

4.5

Gigante, 2012

[16]

Retrospective

cohort study

1985

2009 61 14

NS

0

90

6.8 6.6

Kojima, 2006

[33]

Retrospective

cohort study

1993

2004 55 11

3.9 (0.5

10)

0

44

11.2 7.2

Hora, 2009

[32]

Retrospective

cohort study

2002

2006 54 10

1.6 (0.3

4.5)

0

14

6.5 (0

12.8)

Peces, 200

4 b [ 34]

Retrospective

cohort study

1982

2001 60 11

3.5 (0

20)

0

8

5.0 3.9

Gulanikar, 1998

[36]

Retrospective

cohort study

1995

1997 37

1.2 (0.4

2.75)

0

8

6

Shingleton, 1998

[37]

Retrospective

cohort study

1984

1994 42.3

(1

9)

0

4

3

max = maximum; min = minimum; NS = not stated; SD = standard deviation.

a

Update of Penn.

b

1995 update of Peces 2001.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O GY 7 3 ( 2 0 18 ) 9 4

10 8

98