Table 2
–
Characteristics of the included studies: prostate cancer
Study
(1st author, yr)
Study
type
Recruitment
period
Mean age
(yr)
Mean
follow-up
from cancer
treatment,
yr (range or SD)
No. of patients
Duration of
dialysis before
cancer treatment,
yr (mean, range,
or SD)
Transplantation Dialysis
Tillou, 2014
[25]Retrospective
cohort study
2003
–
2013
62
3.2 (0.5
–
6.5)
14
5
NS
Chapman, 2001
[46]Retrospective
cohort study
1963
–
1999
NS
NS
5
42
NS
Woodle, 200
5 a [ 9]Retrospective
cohort study
NS
61
3.32 (1.7
–
15.2)
9
0 b0
NS
Chahwan, 2017
[38]Retrospective
cohort study
1993
–
2015
59.8 (45.6
–
72.9)
3
52
0
NS
Schonberger, 2002
[39]Case report
NS
62
4
1
1
NS
Ozcelik, 2015
[40]Case report
2015
63
1.5
1
0
NS
Kocak, 2009
[41]Case report
2009
–
2010
57
0.5
1
0
NS
Yiou, 1999
[26]Case report
1999
69
4.5
1
0
NS
NS = not stated; SD = standard deviation.
a
Woodle 2005 is the last update of the prostate cancer cancer cohort of Penn 1997.
b
77 renal, 10 heart, 3 liver transplantations.
Table 1
–
Characteristics of the included studies: kidney cancer
Study
(1st author, yr)
Study
type
Recruitment
period
Mean
age (yr)
Mean follow-up
from cancer
treatment,
yr (range or SD)
No. of patients
Duration of
dialysis before
cancer treatment,
yr (mean, range, or SD)
Transplantation Dialysis
Ryosaka, 2015
[27]Retrospective
cohort study
2000
–
2013 56 11
3.75 3.5
44
158
14.2 8
Chapman, 2001
[46]Retrospective
cohort study
1963
–
1999 NS
NS
37
73
NS
Savaj, 2003
[28]Retrospective
cohort study
1997
–
2002 52
NS
2
6
5.1
Penn, 199
7 a [ 4]Retrospective
cohort study
<
1997
NS
>
5
274
0
NS
Breda, 2015
[14]Retrospective
cohort study
NS
58 (37
–
66)
7.52 (7.02
–
7.99)
58
0
4.0
Sheashaa, 2011
[23]Retrospective
cohort study
1997
–
2008 56 14
4.7
12
0
1.8 (0.4
–
5)
Median
(min
–
max)
Denton, 2002
[24]Retrospective
cohort study
1994
–
2000 53 6
2.6 1.9
11
0
3.36 (0
–
10)
Joshi, 2008
[29]Case report
2008
37
9
1
0
0.5
Takagi, 2017
[30]Retrospective
cohort study
1982
–
2015 56 11
4.8 4.7
0
467
14.3 9
Stiles, 2003
[35]Retrospective
cohort study
1995
–
1990 61
2.12
0
404
NS
Shrewsberry, 2014
[31]Retrospective
cohort study
1999
–
2001 56 13
NS
0
95
4.5
Gigante, 2012
[16]Retrospective
cohort study
1985
–
2009 61 14
NS
0
90
6.8 6.6
Kojima, 2006
[33]Retrospective
cohort study
1993
–
2004 55 11
3.9 (0.5
–
10)
0
44
11.2 7.2
Hora, 2009
[32]Retrospective
cohort study
2002
–
2006 54 10
1.6 (0.3
–
4.5)
0
14
6.5 (0
–
12.8)
Peces, 200
4 b [ 34]Retrospective
cohort study
1982
–
2001 60 11
3.5 (0
–
20)
0
8
5.0 3.9
Gulanikar, 1998
[36]Retrospective
cohort study
1995
–
1997 37
1.2 (0.4
–
2.75)
0
8
6
Shingleton, 1998
[37]Retrospective
cohort study
1984
–
1994 42.3
(1
–
9)
0
4
3
max = maximum; min = minimum; NS = not stated; SD = standard deviation.
a
Update of Penn.
b
1995 update of Peces 2001.
E U R O P E A N U R O L O GY 7 3 ( 2 0 18 ) 9 4
–
10 8
98




